Voting

Active ownership in action: How we use our vote to shape stronger, more sustainable companies.

waving hand icon

What are voting rights?

Voting rights are available to shareholders, so they are only a lever of influence for our investments in equities (which are holding shares in a company either directly or indirectly in the underlying funds held by the funds of funds). 

Voting rights are an important tool for active owners as they give the right to vote in the decisions companies make in their Annual General Meetings (AGMs). The meetings are an opportunity for investors to have their say on important matters relating to companies. 

The votes raised at AGMs are called resolutions, there are two main categories:

These are put forward by the company’s Board and Executive Team asking for shareholders to approve their past actions or future plans. They represent the majority of items to vote on and cover issues such as electing Board members, executive pay, financial matters, audit and transparency.

These are put forward by investors, on issues they feel the company is not managing well or represent significant risks. They are a method for investors to escalate concerns when company engagement hasn’t resulted in a desired outcome.

At each company AGM there will be a list of all the resolutions put forward with a recommendation from the company Management on how to vote. For investors they have the opportunity to attend the meeting in person to vote or send their vote instruction electronically through a proxy.

For each AGM there is an outcome for all resolutions which is either a pass, fail or sometimes resolutions are withdrawn. Ordinary resolutions require more than 50% of votes cast to pass. Special resolutions, which are for fundamental changes to a company require at least 75% of votes cast to pass. 

Management resolutions will usually receive enough support from shareholders to pass. This is due to proxy voting, where the outcome of voting is usually known ahead of the AGM, so if a Management resolution is likely to fail they may withdraw the resolution. Shareholder resolutions often fail, this can be because investors will take the Management recommended to vote against or not receive support because it is viewed as too prescriptive. 

It isn’t just the outcome of the vote that matters, if a significant number of investors have voted against a Management recommendation it sends a signal of dissatisfaction on an issue. Receiving over 30% support for a shareholder resolution is viewed as a significant challenge and as such Management will normally implement at least part of the resolutions demands. Also, if Management feels a shareholder vote will pass they may agree to implement the shareholder’s demands in exchange for a withdrawal of the resolution.

Voting outcomes

Our Investment Adviser, Aberdeen votes on behalf of our directly invested equity funds (Octopus UK Index Tracking Trust and Octopus Climate Change Fund). Voting for equity funds held within our funds of funds is carried out on our behalf by the funds Investment Manager. 

Aberdeen vote aligned with their voting policy, which guides their approach to important issues including those in relation to sustainability and governance. We work with Aberdeen Investments on how they make progress on key issues and using their influence through voting.

All votes are important, but not all are viewed as significant. Aberdeen has a way of identifying votes which are considered significant based on an internal categorisation across high profile votes, sustainability and governance issues, engagement outcomes and corporate transactions. 

The following votes made by Aberdeen during 2025 are the voting record for our directly invested funds, Octopus UK Index Tracking Trust and Octopus Climate Change Fund. The record shows which key issues the vote relates to, the how Aberdeen voted, their rationale and the outcome of the vote.

Significant votes

Here are the significant votes our Investment Adviser have voted on in 2025.

Environmental
CompanyMatter voted onResolution TypeCompany voting instructionOur vote direction takenOur vote rationaleOutcome
Aviva PlcApprove Climate-Related Financial DisclosureManagementForAbstainWhile welcoming increased transparency, we abstained because such votes may limit investor challenge, increase corporate risk, impact climate strategy integration, and diminish the board’s direct accountability.Pass
Centrica PlcApprove Climate Transition PlanManagementForAbstainWhile welcoming increased transparency, we abstained because such votes may limit investor challenge, increase corporate risk, impact climate strategy integration, and diminish the board’s direct accountability.Pass
Ninety One PlcApprove Climate StrategyManagementForAbstainWhile welcoming increased transparency, we abstained because such votes may limit investor challenge, increase corporate risk, impact climate strategy integration, and diminish the board’s direct accountability.Pass
Pennon Group PlcApprove Climate-Related Financial DisclosuresManagementForAbstainWhile welcoming increased transparency, we abstained because such votes may limit investor challenge, increase corporate risk, impact climate strategy integration, and diminish the board’s direct accountability.Pass
Rio Tinto PlcApprove Climate Action PlanManagementForAbstainWhile encouraged by Rio Tinto’s decarbonisation progress, we abstained as these climate votes may limit investor challenge, increase corporate risk, and diminish the board’s direct accountability.Pass
Severn Trent PlcApprove Net Zero Transition PlanManagementForAbstainWhile welcoming increased transparency, we abstained because such votes may limit investor challenge, increase corporate risk, impact climate strategy integration, and diminish the board’s direct accountability.Pass
Shell PlcRequest Company Disclose Whether and How Its: Demand Forecast For LNG; LNG Production And Sales Targets; And New Capital Expenditure In Natural Gas Assets; Are Consistent With Climate Commitments, Including Target To Reach Net Zero Emissions By 2025ShareholderAgainstAgainstWe oppose the resolution because Shell committed to additional LNG portfolio disclosures. We will continue engaging Shell on energy transition scenarios and breakeven prices to ensure transparency for shareholders.Fail
SSE PlcSSE PlcManagementForAbstainWhile welcoming increased transparency, we abstained because such votes may limit investor challenge, increase corporate risk, impact climate strategy integration, and diminish the board’s direct accountability.Pass
Governance
CompanyMatter voted onResolution typeCompany voting instructionOur vote direction takenOur vote rationaleOutcome
Anglo American PlcAuthorise Issue of Equity in Connection with the MergerManagementForForWe are supportive of the proposed merger between Anglo American and Teck Resources.Pass
Anglo American PlcAmend Long-Term Incentive PlanManagementForAgainstTransaction-related remuneration is poor market practice in the UK, and the high minimum guaranteed vesting level dilutes other performance criteria. We note the company withdrew this resolution due to shareholder concerns.Withdrawn
Baillie Gifford US Growth Trust plcRe-elect Tom Burnet as DirectorManagementForForAlthough the board misses diversity targets and UK listing rule targets, due to a recent resignation, we acknowledge historical compliance. We support the re-election, allowing flexibility, and will revisit the position next year.Pass
BP PlcRe-elect Helge Lund as DirectorManagementForAgainstWe oppose the Chair’s re-election because BP’s prior strategy had significant shortcomings, leading to performance issues and strategy changes. As a top financed emitter, BP must demonstrate a clear, long-term strategy to address material climate risks.Pass
Centrica PlcApprove Remuneration ReportManagementForAgainstWe are concerned by the executives’ excessive salary increases (up to 28.7%), which vastly exceed the wider workforce’s raises, lack clear rationale, and directly boost long-term variable pay awards.Pass
Deliveroo PlcApprove Remuneration ReportManagementForAgainstWe oppose the remuneration policy due to the CFO’s significant one-off restricted share plan award. Totalling 700% of base salary when combined with the pay policy statement, the size is a material concern.Pass
Microsoft CorporationAdvisory Vote to Ratify Named Executive Officers’ CompensationManagementForForWe support this resolution to ensure competitive pay is provided to maintain top management.Pass
Social
CompanyMatter voted onResolution typeCompany voting instructionOur vote direction takenOur vote rationaleOutcome
Deere & CompanyReport on Effectiveness of Efforts to Create a Meritocratic WorkplaceShareholderAgainstAgainstDeere currently reports sufficient workforce data to assess its DEI programs. Producing an additional report would be unnecessarily burdensome, warranting a vote against.Withdrawn
Deere & CompanyReport on a Civil Rights AuditShareholderAgainstAgainstWhile we recognise the possible merits of the Civil Rights Audit Standard, we currently have reservations about requesting the application of a new standard.Fail
JD Sports Fashion PlcOversee the Preparation of a Report to Provide Investors the Information Needed to Assess the Company’s Approach to Human Capital ManagementShareholderAgainstAgainstJD Sports has enhanced benefits, including maternity leave and eliminating age-based pay banding. We will set milestones for continued disclosure progress, rendering this proposal unnecessary currently.Fail
Marks & Spencer Group PlcOversee the Preparation of a Report to Provide Investors the Information Needed to Assess the Company’s Approach to Human Capital ManagementShareholderAgainstAgainstM&S pays all direct employees Real Living Wage and sets strong expectations for third-party contractors. Their sufficient disclosure enables shareholders to adequately assess human capital management and associated risks.Fail
Microsoft CorporationReport on Risks of Microsoft’s ESP being Utilized for Censorship of Legitimate SpeechShareholderAgainstAgainstThe resolution overlooks existing safeguards. The European Security Programme counters sophisticated cyber threats through AI-driven analytics, rather than deploying generative AI or facilitating censorship.Fail
Microsoft CorporationReport on Risks of Censorship in Generative Artificial IntelligenceShareholderAgainstAgainstMicrosoft provides robust disclosure on societal AI risks. Its Responsible AI Standard emphasizes transparency and fairness, supplemented by tools to monitor and mitigate bias in generative models.Fail
Microsoft CorporationReport on AI Data Usage OversightShareholderAgainstAgainstMicrosoft has strengthened data governance and signed the EU’s voluntary GPAI Code of Practice. Given forthcoming EU AI Act requirements, an additional report risks duplicating regulatory obligations.Fail
Microsoft CorporationReport on Risks of Operating in Countries with Significant Human Rights ConcernsShareholderAgainstForDespite Microsoft’s alignment with human rights principles, recent controversies raise oversight concerns. The proposed report would provide valuable assurance regarding risks associated with global data center developments.Fail
Microsoft CorporationHuman Rights Risk AssessmentShareholderAgainstAgainstAlthough Microsoft prohibits using services to violate human rights, recent conflicts highlight potential process gaps. Assessing these processes could strengthen oversight and mitigate legal, financial, and reputational risks.Fail
Microsoft CorporationReport on Risks of Using Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Tools for Oil and Gas Development and ProductionShareholderAgainstAgainstMicrosoft has clear emissions reduction goals. Although Scope 3 emissions rose due to AI and data center expansion, they enforce strict Energy Principles for energy sector clients.Fail
Next PlcApprove ShareAction Requisitioned ResolutionShareholderAgainstAgainstAlthough workforce disclosure needs improvement, the company plans to address this. Their approach should align with overall strategy and consider all labor factors, making this proposal inappropriate currently.Fail
Novo NordiskApprove Proposal Regarding Regulated Working Conditions at Construction SitesShareholderAgainstAgainstThe proposal lacks compelling rationale, fails to define key terms, and ignores international labor law differences, making compliance unfair and onerous for the company.Fail
ESG
CompanyMatter voted onResolution typeCompany voting instructionOur vote direction takenOur vote rationaleOutcome
Deere & CompanyReport on Statistical Differences in Hiring Across Race and GenderShareholderAgainstAgainstDeere reports sufficient demographic workforce data in its Business Impact Report. This prescriptive vote to produce an additional report would be unduly burdensome.Withdrawn
Deere & CompanyEstablish a Board Committee on Corporate Financial SustainabilityShareholderAgainstAgainstWe are comfortable with Deere’s‚ current approach to mitigating sustainability risks. The company discloses relevant information which appears to align with US market practice, and committee structures are best left to the board’s discretion.Fail
Deere & CompanyReport on Discrimination in Charitable ContributionsShareholderAgainstAgainstDeere provides adequate information and maintains sufficient governance oversight structures regarding its charitable contributions, making the requested report unnecessary.Fail
Linde PlcReport on Climate LobbyingShareholderAgainstAgainstThe company provides thorough disclosure of trade association memberships and is actively delivering green and blue hydrogen projects driven by strong customer demand.Withdrawn